Abstract
Objectives: This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate the effects of four commercially available whitening and conventional toothpastes on the surface roughness of contemporary restorative materials, including an alkasite, a nano-hybrid composite, a nano-hybrid flowable composite, an ormocer-based flowable material, and a zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer.
Materials and Methods: A total of 225 specimens were prepared and subjected to standardized simulated tooth-brushing equivalent to one month of clinical use. Surface roughness (Ra) values were measured before and after brushing using a contact profilometer. Non-parametric statistical tests (Wilcoxon, Kruskal–Wallis, Dunn with Bonferroni correction) were used to analyze changes within and between material–toothpaste combinations.
Results: Significant differences in surface roughness were found among most material–toothpaste combinations (p < 0.05). Ormocer, flowable composites (NF0, NF2), and Zirconomer (Z2, Z3) showed the greatest susceptibility to abrasion, while NF3–NF4, A3–A4, and several nanohybrid subgroups (N1–N3–N4) demonstrated similar resistance with no significant changes.
Conclusion: These findings indicate that the abrasivity of toothpastes influences restorative materials in a highly material-dependent manner. Clinical toothpaste selection should therefore consider the type of restorative material present.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Cansu Yıkıcı Çöl
